by Original Anonymous
Michael (DeKort),
I’m glad to see that your misunderstanding of what a SCIF actually is has been cleared up. I still don’t think you have clearly accepted the NSC TEMPEST time line. from my first hand experience and direct conversations with those present before me (at the deck plates) I can lay out for you a clear path for the TEMPEST process:
- WMSL crew identified serious concerns with shipboard systems (EMO was a prior TEMPEST inspector)
- CG-9, 6, and 8 accepted concerns.
- CG-9 confronted LMCO which started theur was not contractual obligation for systems to be compliant with TEMPEST standards (it is important to understand that the Navy has this same problem with LMCO. Their solution is to just accept the ship and fix it themselves since its cheaper).
- LMCO accepted responsibility to fix system but CG had to pay for it.
- Ship failed visual inspection (at shipyard in early ‘0
LMCO began rearhitecture of systems (this lead to serious degradation of some sytems to allow for compliance (Air search radar and security cameras for example) which have still not been resolved but are TEMPEST compliant).
Some of these reworkings within the ship required numerous computer cabinets to be removed (WAESCHE and STRATTON racks were designed to be with standards and installed on BERTHOLF. Noncompliant racks were then redesigned to be compliant and installed in WAESCHE). This may have been what kicked off the thought that systems were removed to pass INSURV. this inspection is to safety only and has nothing to do with TEMPEST. C4I installs and removals may have been going on concurrently (spring ‘08, ship still in yards, not yet accepted).
CG signs DD-250 for WMSL 750 (C4I still not TEMPEST compliant and over 5,000 INSURV violations noted). DD-250 listed all TEMPEST and INSURV concerns. This resulted in a CONDITIONAL acceptance of Hull 1. NGSS/LMCO still liable/responsible for addressing all DD-250 concerns prior to full acceptance of the ship.
NSC still under constraints from DD-250 and Warranty period. LMCO/NGSS are still onboard fixing the issues noted.
Full acceptance of the ship still pends.
The CG really had no choice but to accept the ship and move forward. No real work was happening on the ship at the yards. On average only two dozens workers were onboard each day doing the work. There really was no impetus on their part to fix/finish the ship. Every day the ship remained at the yard was more money the CG was paying, not just on that hull but on all future hulss since it gets figured into the fixed cost on future hulls. It wasn’t until the CG accepted the ship that the crew coud actually start managing the work onboard, supervising the quality of the work, inspecting the results, and removing workers the were literally hiding around the ship and sleeping.
The BERTHOLF is now on the west coast and managing all of the remaining issues through MLC, ELC, and ship’s force oversight. Instead of being forced to watch worthless workers drag their feet they can now contract to competent contractors and complete the work on time, within budget, and at a proper quality level. I would venture that more work has been done on the ship since departure from MS than was done in its last year at the yard. In the yard there was rarely more than 30 works on board. In Alameda an average of 70 workers have been onboard six days a week plus ship’s force, NESU, MLC, and othe CG members. Even with the ship under way half of the time more is getting done since contractors are sailing with the ship to address issues and working on the ship during port calls.
With regards to TEMPEST, the day of reckoning is coming. Within the next five months the work, and hopefully final instrument inspection will be done and awaiting final approval. We all, including yourself should hope it goes well. I’d like nothing better than to put this issue to bed and focus instead on all the rest of the problems NGSS and LMCO left us with.
Recent Comments