Coast Guard Still Unable to Ballance its Books – Is the Finance Center at Fault?
The Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General released the Independent Auditor’s Report on Auditability Assessment of the Department of Homeland Security’s Statement of Budgetary Resources today.
During the previous DHS consolidated financial statement audits, weaknesses were identified in recording transactions related to the commitments, obligations, undelivered orders, and disbursements. During FY 2008, USCG continued its remediation efforts over the financial reporting and budgetary processes. Although improvements were made, KPMG found that many of these prior years’ conditions continue to exist and they are included in the condition below.
Condition: USCG has not designed or implemented effective policies, procedures, and internal controls, to support management’s assertions associated with the statement of budgetary resources, including opening balances and topside adjustments. With regard to the financial statement assertions, KPMG identified the following:
1. USCG did not implement a sound methodology to establish accurate general ledger systems opening balances for fiscal year 2008. In an attempt to support their financial statements with the general ledger balances, USCG recorded mainly unsupported, summary-level topside adjustments into the Core Accounting System (CAS) prior to the FY 2007 system closes of CAS, the Aviation Logistics Management Information System (ALMIS), and the Naval Engineering Supply Support System (NESSS). The summary topside adjustments recorded into CAS included adjustments to account balances that should have been recorded in ALMIS and NESSS as well. USCG reversed the entries shortly after establishing the fiscal year 2008 opening balances, further calling into question the validity of the procedure itself. In addition, the CAS closing logic did not properly close the nominal accounts into the permanent accounts and establish proper beginning balances. USCG recorded topside journal entries to correct the closing logic deficiencies in the opening balance file submitted to DHS but did not correct the deficiencies in CAS, resulting in inaccurate opening system-level budgetary balances.
2. USCG has not developed and implemented an effective reconciliation process at the general ledger system level to ensure that each FY 2008 system’s opening budgetary balances accurately reflect its FY 2007 closing balances. USCG’s current reconciliation is performed at the USCG TIER database level and not at the individual general ledger system level; therefore, the reconciliation does not support the overall accuracy of the general ledger systems opening balances.
3. USCG has not fully developed and implemented procedures to validate the entire USCG UDO balance as of September 30, 2008. In addition, USCG did not timely record activity to its UDO balances, as they do not properly define a UDO. USCG only reduces a balance when a payment is made, rather than when goods/services are received/completed.
Effect: USCG’s current process is not effective to produce accurate and complete budgetary financial information for submission to DHS resulting in potentially materially misstated DHS consolidated statement of budgetary resources. The USCG TIER account balances that support the financial statements and opening balances are not supported at a transaction level and do not agree to the general ledger systems account balances. Further, manual errors have gone undetected and system issues have not been identified and corrected timely that could affect prior periods as well as multiple accounts and financial statement line items.
Cause: USCG has not designed and implemented appropriate controls over the financial reporting process to ensure that (1) opening balances are accurate and reflected in the proper general ledger system and (2) topside adjustments are valid, complete, accurate, and recorded to the proper general ledger system. Because USCG has not designed a comprehensive, integrated accounting system to comply with the FFMIA system requirements and the USSGL at the transaction level, USCG created unsuccessful workaround solutions in preparing its financial statement data rather than determining and correcting the causes of system posting logic issues. In addition, USCG has not properly analyzed analytic out-of balance conditions in its 3 general ledger systems to timely research and resolve these variances with proper supporting documentation. Further, USCG has not completed its remediation efforts over the UDO validation process, to include implementing properly designed and fully effective internal controls.







Recent Comments